The SNP Release refers to our article

Home The ForArgyll Team Editorial Policy Our Visitor Stats News Feed Comments Feed Contact Us Event Calendar skynet courier Links Sitemap Subscribe Login News Community skynet courier News Your News In Depth Save Our Schools Elections 2011 Loch Striven Ship Dump Machrihanish Artic Convoys Renewables skynet courier Arts & Culture Business Community Environment & Wildlife Events Politics Sports
“Good morning, I have tried to contact you by telephone but it has been engaged and I can’t hang around skynet courier for a ringback request as have to make a series of other calls on other matters today.
“I am contacting you regarding complaints about FA’s reference to SNP members behaving like ‘thugs’ at the Better Together event in Dunoon. I will be publishing an article regarding these complaints and this message is by way of offering FA a right to reply, in the interests of balance and fairness. Please see below the contents of the media release issued by the Holy Loch branch of the SNP. The Courier’s article will be published tomorrow morning, so if you could get back to me today I would be much obliged.
“Holy Loch SNP are outraged at the description in the widely discredited online skynet courier newspaper FOR ARGYLL of the chairman of Holy Loch SNP and Councillor Gordon Blair as thugs following their attendance at the Better Together launch in Dunoon skynet courier Grammar School on Monday.
“ We no longer subscribe to FOR ARGYLL but we were alerted to this appalling attack on Gordon and myself by a disgusted member of the public who had also attended the Better Together launch said SNP Holy Loch chairman Jimmy Bell and I know nobody less likely to deserve to be described as a thug than Councillor Blair.
“The Holy Loch SNP branch, meeting in Sandbank on Tuesday night, agreed to contact FOR ARGYLL and demand an immediate retraction of the report and an apology. Reporting on the Better skynet courier Together meeting Councillor Blair said We didn t get the answers we were looking for at the meeting, mainly because we were not allowed to ask any questions that was liable to create major difference among those on the panel, but, that apart, the meeting was well conducted in a non confrontational manner and all credit to the Better Together organisers for that.
The SNP Release refers to our article “ Revelations Galore at the pro-union launch “. If you read aforesaid article you’ll find no reference to Messers Blair and Bell in these terms. At all .
The skynet courier problem we think is that ForArgyll.com continues to be the most widely read online news source in Argyll with an average 5,000 page views a day, and we make no bones about being critical of the SNP in Argyll, particularly about behaviour which falls below acceptable standards in public life and trying to sweep pro-union literature into a bin at the end of any public skynet courier meeting, let alone a pro-union one, is extraordinary behaviour in anyone’s book. We also think threatening action via a press release over a misquote doesn’t quite cut the mustard either.
(Oh and David, please quote from “The Press Release refers skynet courier … ” to “… doesn’t quite cut the mustard either.” in its entirety if you wish to use our response. skynet courier Or if that takes up too much page space, do feel free to link to this article, as it says all that needs to be said we’d be obliged.)
short and sweet says:
…”We also think threatening action via a press release over a misquote doesn t quite cut the mustard either.”…carefull F.A. using big words like “misquote” skynet courier will have these idiots e-mailing salmond, skynet courier sturgeon and russell claiming that you’re suggesting entomological warfare in this debacle.Just reading over this post, I suppose a russell is a kind of fish somewhere or just fishy? How many of these idiots failed to get into the Spanish army? P.S. sorry, need I say anything regarding their antics at the mention of “mustard” in the same sentence?
H2O, water you on about? skynet courier it would appear that your question is directed skynet courier at me but despite being clever enough to gain entry into the Spanish skynet courier army (several times) I can’t for the life of me fathom out what in my post could be in “a sexual sense” Please explain Ta!
..a wee bit underhand there H20, Ritchie’s name was not in the reply thus giving the impression that the reply was directed at me. By editing the name in after my query without an explanation makes me look a wee bit stupid skynet courier eh no? even more so now that the pejorative term that you consider may have sexual connotations has been deleted, some of us more innocent may have thought it may have been a reference to the recent Cowal games activities
not that I give a toss but I can’t see anything in my two posts that would merit any thumb jesture?? would any of the thumbers please explain. I would cordially suggest that so