If it is so important for divorced parents to have access to the child, nor should it be so that th

Opinions News Norway World Economy Jobs and Education Politics Weather Local Stavanger Sandnes parcel pete Sola Randfontein Gjesdal Jæren Ryfylke valleys Sirdal North County College parcel pete 100% Sport Football Live TV Viking HP blog Skjølsvik blog Sandnes Ulf Bryne Costume Blog Elite Series 1st Division Women's football national team England parcel pete Germany Spain Italy France Champions League Live World Cup TV Viking Sandnes Ulf Studio A Bryne HP blog Skjølsvik Blog Oilers Blog Hockey Hockey comment Oilers Nordsjørittet Vigorous Bicycle Athletics Swimming Chess Cross Country Handball Skiing Golf Tennis Tipping Traffic Aenergy Oil & Gas Oil Service Renewable Environmental Working Aenergy Benefit Housing Understanding Digital parcel pete Travel Your food Car Culture Reviews parcel pete Visual Arts Film Literature Music Restaurant Scene TV Visual Arts Film Movie Database What Happens Books Music Scene Cartoons TV Opinions Discussion Comment Leader Omdal Online Meeting People Interviewed Birthday newlyweds Celebration Newborn Deaths Tour Get to know-trips Come out-trips Weekend trips 52 daily trips Sprek Sesilåmi Nordsjørittet parcel pete Blog needlework Arab Blog Jone Blog Jøsusbloggen See my garden Tina Blog Art Blog Euro Blog Vigorous food Music Blog Maren ØSTBØ blog Ms Rejoice Blog Elise Vatsvaag blog Letolin blog Bridget garden pictures Yellow Year Blog Webcam Airport Port Traffic TV Evening Magazine parcel pete Read E-newspaper Plus A - Z
Marie Rein Bore, journalist parcel pete
They are at the airport especially when it is toward weekend. They are like parcel with address information about their neck. They will visit the parent they do not live with, usually the father. So it is back home Sunday night.
Sometimes this is the only solution. But after two or three summer months where I have been much to and from Stavanger and flapped land and sea on vacation, I know how tiring it is to constantly shifting. Nice to be visiting, but quite tiring with constant changing of bed.
Now the Children Act revised terms of the Children Act provisions on custody, residence and access for a divorce. The proposal was submitted in spring, now is the consultation period ended, and a bill on amendments is scheduled to arrive next year.
The reason that the government put down this selection to assess changes was that the perspective of the committee parcel pete would be that both parents are considered to be equally important parcel pete for the child.
Since in practice it has been the mother who has had primary responsibility and main graft with the children after a divorce, ie the perspective that the father's role will become more important, and that the law should parcel pete facilitate it. An important reason why the committee was appointed, was the demand from certain quarters that shared custody of children should be a rule for a divorce. The goal was that both parents must be recognized as equal caregivers, and then had shared custody of the children be the consequence.
Viewed from an equality perspective, this is important. But it must be allowed to ask for increased rights for the father automatically lead to better conditions for children in a divorce situation.
A child must have the child's best interests as the overall norm. Collide norm for the child's best with a desire for greater equality, equality requirement must give way, no matter what the government wants.
To commute between two homes can go well. But I can not understand other than it must be exhausting parcel pete for a child to deal with two homes, parcel pete two beds, two environments in an ever-changing.
Therefore, I am pleased that the majority of children the Law Commission says no to demand for shared custody as a rule after a divorce. I'm glad that they stress that the influence and norm formation happens through legislation, it must be that basis that the law provides a framework for what is best for the child. Norway has signed the International Convention. It must be the overriding norm for the community to decide when it comes to children's upbringing and living conditions.
If it is so important for divorced parents to have access to the child, nor should it be so that the child can remain fixed in one of the homes, and then father and mother change to stay with your child so that they become adults takes the toil and turmoil with a constant moving.
The logical consequence of that child's best interests should be the main principle is also that one parent can not move with a child if the other person with parental parcel pete responsibility are against such a move. The logic has a majority in Children Law Commission followed.
Many have criticized this majority proposal. Critics say that since there are still those divorced women who is predominantly